Saturday, June 14, 2014

Why would the Puritan townsperson reference him(Daniel) in this situation? -Chapter 3, page 60

You must be referring to this
quote:



Of a
truth, friend, that matter remaineth a riddle; and the Daniel who shall yet expound it
is yet a-wanting."



Daniel was
a prophet in the bible. Not to be confused with the David of the bible, who would have
had many concubines and women. The Puritan woman who makes this sentence is essentially
saying that because Hester won't talk and the magistrates cannot seem to figure out who
the father is, they need a spiritual person to discern the truth and figure it out.
Today we could use paternity tests. Back then, they would have heavily relied on a dream
interpreter like Daniel to explain what the truth of the riddle might be. They are
hoping a person will step forward to interpret the situation and reveal the truth to
everyone.


Daniel of the bible was able to interpret dreams
and would give even divulge consequences of the future if certain steps were not
taken.


There is a reference shortly after to the guilty
one, but the paragraph is not clear that Daniel and the guilty one are the same "he"
referred to later.


ANOTHER INTERPRETATION could be that
Daniel and the guilty one are the same person. But, this does not seem Puritan-like. To
make a biblical allusion to Daniel would be to look for someone to be the master
revealer. But infidelity does not align with the character of Daniel. Therefore, the
reference might only be to the guilty man, whoever he is, to be a great revealer in
order to tell the people he is Hester's secret lover.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Film: 'Crocodile Dundee' directed by Peter FaimanHow are stereotypical roles upheld and challenged?

One of the stereotypes that is both upheld and challenged is the role of the damsel in distress. Sue is supposed to be the delic...