Wednesday, December 31, 2014

How do you solve questions concerning probability?

To solve questions where you need to find the probability
of any event taking place, you first need to determine two
values:


1. The number of ways in which the event can take
place (a)


2. The total number of events that are possible
(b)


Using these values, the probability of the event taking
place is given by the value of a/b.


The value of the
probability of anything happening or not happening always lies in the set [0, 1]. No
event can have a probability less than 0 or more than 1. The probability of an event not
taking place is equal to 1 - the probability of the event taking
place.


Given the probability of two mutually exclusive
events a and b taking place as P(a) and P(b), the probability that both take place is
P(a)*P(b) and the probability that either of them takes place is P(a) +
P(b).

In Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, is Miss Bingley speaking of Elizabeth's independence and spirit when she refers to "that little something,...

Yes, in a way Miss Bingley is speaking of Elizabeth's free
spirit and independent mind. What she means when she speaks of Elizabeth's conceit can
be easily seen in a passage just above this one. Elizabeth responds to Darcy's question
if she wanted to dance a reel by stating:


readability="13">

Oh!...I heard you before; but I could not
immediately determine what to say in reply. You wanted me, I know, to say "Yes," that
you might have the pleasure of despising my taste; but I always delight in overthrowing
those kind of schemes, and cheating a person of their premeditated contempt. I have
therefore made up my mind to tell you that I do not want to dance a reel at all -- and
now despise me if you dare. (Ch. 10, Vol.
1)



In this passage, we see
that not only does Elizabeth make assumptions, she has a very high opinion of  her
ability to discern a situation, and she even has a high opinion of her wit. She assumed
a motive for Darcy asking her about dancing and responded in a very ironic
manner.

This response is also an example of impertinence. In order for
her to respond to Darcy in such a way, she assumes that she stands in a place in society
that allows her to do so. Miss Bingley sees Darcy as being socially above her, which is
true, considering who his family members are. Therefore, it is socially unacceptable, or
rude, or impertinent for Elizabeth to joke with Darcy.

However, since
the reader sees Elizabeth in a brighter light than Miss Bingley, what Miss Bingley sees
as conceit and impertinence, the reader can see as freedom of spirit and independence of
mind.

Was a bloody civil war the only way to end slavery in America by the middle of the 19th century?

This is, of course, a matter of opinion.  I would argue
that a civil war was the only way to end slavery quickly by
the middle of the 19th century.


It seems entirely possible
that slavery would have eventually been done away with by peaceful means.  We know that
Brazil abolished slavery in the 1880s without having to go through a civil war even
though slavery was a very important part of their economy.  There are a number of
reasons slavery might have ended in the US.


First, there
are economic reasons.  Slavery flourished before mechanization.  As agriculture became
more mechanized, mechanized farms would have outcompeted slave plantations.  This would
have made slavery much less economically viable.


Second,
there are moral/political reasons.  If the US had remained the only country with a slave
system (after Brazil abolished theirs) a great deal of pressure would eventually have
been brought to bear on it.  Other countries might eventually have gone so far as to
refuse to trade with the US if slavery still existed.


For
economic reasons or for political reasons, slavery would have ended at some point. 
However, it would have taken a long time for this to happen.  A war was the only way
that slavery could have been ended in a timely fashion.

Barbie is never mentioned in the poem; what is the meaning of using "Barbie Doll" in the title of this poem of the same name, by Marge Piercy?

In the poem, "Barbie Doll," by Marge Piercy, the title
reflects the seemingly perfect essence of the doll, which some might assume to reflect
the physical characteristics of a perfect woman. In the poem, the contradiction between
natural beauty and "popular" beauty are discussed.


We know
that in truth, a woman with the proportions of a Barbie doll href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7920962.stm">would not be able to
stand up
, although some women have tried to copy the Barbie doll
look.


This is one of my long-favorite poems because it
battles some of society's expectations of a young female against the natural and
inner-beauty of girls (who will one day be women). Much like the old adage of children
in general "seen but not heard," this poem addresses (at the time it was written)
America's expectations of little girls:


readability="9">

...dolls that did
pee-pee


and miniature GE stoves and
irons


and wee lipsticks the color of cherry
candy.



This reflected the
norms of the href="http://j-walk.com/other/goodwife/index.htm">1950s when women stayed
home and cooked, cleaned, reared children, and met their husband at the door, dressed to
perfection with dinner waiting on the table. (A copy of Housekeeping
Monthly's
"The Good Wife's Guide"—which may be fictious, though I have seen
copies of the single-page article in school for many years—summarizes these conceptions,
which are not fictious.)


For all of
the little girl's strengths...


readability="12">

She was healthy, tested
intelligent,


possessed strong arms and
back,


abundant sexual drive and manual
dexterity.



...and one would
think that this would be enough, she...


readability="5">

....went to and fro
apologizing.



This is because
she was deemed, we infer by comparing her to the perfect Barbie doll, imperfect with her
"great big nose and fat legs." With her physical attributes aside, the girl is then
taught how to "play the game."


She was advised to play
coy,


exhorted to come on
hearty,


exercise, diet, smile and
wheedle.


The negative side of all this advice is seen with
the phrases "play coy" and "smile and wheedle," as if these things would enhance her
existence and make her more socially acceptable, as would "exercise,
diet."


Unable to be all that her peers, and later society,
expects of her, the young girl grows tired of working so hard because she has been told
she is, as noted in Dave Barry's essay, "Beauty and the Beast," " href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1376541/posts">not good
enough
." Symbolically, she cuts off nose and legs, but I think this literally
means she takes her own life.


readability="5">

Her good nature wore
out


like a fan belt.


So she
cut off her nose and her legs


and offered them
up.



Only in death can the
"undertaker" make her look as society would wish with a putty nose and pretty
nightgown.


readability="10">

...a turned-up putty
nose,


dressed in a pink and white
nightie


Doesn't she look pretty? everyone
said.



Sadly, not much has
changed—the skinny Barbie has lost its impact (though many women would argue the point),
but celebrities, and women in television and magazine ads, have taken the doll's place.
Our daughters are encouraged to be thin and voluptuous, with long lashes, flawless skin,
permanent tans, and pearly white, teeth-straight
smiles.


Though the poem does not use "Barbie doll" in it,
the inference is clear, and if anyone knows anything about a Barbie doll and/or has
owned one, it is easy to see why the author is concerned with the messages sent to so
many girls as to what is needed to be "good enough," when who we
are should be praised, and be "more than good enough."

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

How was Charlotte Lucas' choices limited in Pride and Prejudice Please provide evidence and quotes

Sir William Lucas, desp[ite having a title, was unable to
give his daughters a sufficient dowry to enable them to marry well. The family, with its
numerous children, really could not afford to support unmarried daughters, and the
daughters themselves could not get jobs without losing their status at gentlewomen.
Charlotte, at 27, was considered nearly beyond marriagable age, when she received the
offer from Mr. Collins. Given the economic situation of her family and her
age, accepting the offer was the only possible way she could avoid being an
economic liability to her family -- she had no other economic oppportunities. She
herself sees the practical necessity of the marriage, and unlike the more romantic
Elizabeth, decides to make the best of Mr. Collins.

In "The Masque of the Red Death", what do the tripods with the flames represent? Edgar Allan Poe's "The Masque of the Red Death"

The masquerade, a "voluptuous scene," with ornaments and
tapestries and stained glass windows in the various chambers, but there is no light of
any kind within the suite of chambers.  Instead, in the corridors there are heavy
tripods lighted with burning coals that project rays of light through the tinted glass
and by projections of its light, the rooms are illuminated.  But, the effect of
the projected light is Gothic, creating ghastly appearances, upon the faces and costumes
of the guests.  Especially in the black chamber, the light
produced



so
wild a look upon the countenances of those who entered that there were few of the
company bold enough to set foot with its precincts at
all.



It is as though
the chambers have a bizarre dreamlike quality.  The narrator
describes



much
glare and glitter and piquancy and phantasm....To and fro in the seven chambers there
stalked, in fact a multitude of
dreams.



The rays of light
that stream from the tripods seem to represent the flow of life, the flow of the dreams
of man, who has a multitude of dreams.  But, as the night progresses, the clock peals
and a grotesque and terrifying guest appears.  When Prince Prospero attempts to be rid
of this hideous interloper, he is overcome, falling "prostrate in death." With the
presence of the Red Death comes the death of all
the guests,


readability="6">

And the life of the ebony clock went out with
that of the last of the gay.  And the flames of the tripods expired. And Darkness and
Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over
all.



With the expiration of
life, the flames that give light and warmth to the seven ages of life also
expire. Truly, they are symbolic of the life-sustaining blood that courses through the
chambers of the human body.

Monday, December 29, 2014

In "Revelation" by Flannery O'Conner, why is it appropriate that the two major settings for the action in this story are a doctor's waiting room...

The doctor’s waiting room and pig parlor are
appropriate places for Mrs. Turpin’s revelations because they are both places where she
puts her needs above those of others.


In the
doctor’s office, Mrs. Turpin assumes she is the most important person there.  Yet
doctor’s offices cater to sick people.  Mrs. Turpin is neither the most important person
nor the sickest person there. 


There was one vacant chair
and a place on the sofa occupied by a blond child in a dirty blue romper who should have
been told to move over and make room for the lady.


Mrs.
Turpin is not sick.  She is there to accompany her husband, who got kicked by a cow. 
She is just selfish, assuming she should have a spot to sit.  She could stand just as
well as anyone else.


The pig parlor is an example of Mrs.
Turpin’s vanity.  She is proud of the fact that her pigs are not raised like
pigs.



Our hogs
are not dirty and they don't stink," she said. "They're cleaner than some children I've
seen. Their feet never touch the ground. We have a pig-parlor- that's where you raise
them on concrete," 



Mrs.
Turpin does not care how pigs are supposed to be raised, or the fact that they like cool
mud.  She always puts her needs above anyone else’s.


When
she returns to the pig parlor at the end of the story, the revelation from the doctor’s
office has not entirely set in yet.  She is still mulling over the idea that she is not
above everyone else.  She sees a light in the pig
parlor.



Then
like a monumental statue coming to life, she bent her head slowly and gazed, as if
through the very heart of mystery, down into the pig parlor at the
hogs. 



It seems as if she has
fallen into a meditative state upon looking at the hogs, creatures that she does not
take care of well enough.


Mrs. Turpin's vision extends to
Heaven, where she sees others ascending.  These are people she has looked down upon, and
people she has placed below herself.  She realizes then, in those two places, that she
is just another woman.  She is no better than anyone else.

What is Abigail's vision?no

In Act III, Abigail claims that she sees Mary Warren's
spirit take the shape of bird on the rafters of the court.  The "vision" occurs right as
the court begins to see through her claims that she and her friends have been afflicted
by witchcraft.  As soon as she sees the vision, she is able to shift attention off of
her and onto Mary Warren and Proctor.  She pleads with the bird (Mary Warren) to not
attack her.  Mary Warren finds herself unable to argue against the claim as Abigail, and
then the rest of the girls, repeat every thing she says.  The call and response
continues until finally Mary Warren gives in.  Unable to fight the girls, she switches
to their side and points her finger at Proctor calling him "the devil's man" and telling
the courts she "loves God" and so will "go his (Proctor's) way no
longer."

Why exactly does Juliet side Romeo over Tybalt after knowing how Tybalt was killed?Please give all the possible reasons, if possible. :) Thank you! :)


readability="4.5505617977528">

src="http://d2hej51cni6o0x.cloudfront.net/images/user_icons/Educator_Female_Small.png"
class="profilePic" alt="wannam's profile pic"/>
src="http://d2hej51cni6o0x.cloudfront.net/images/core/educator-indicator_thumb.png"
class="premium-indicator"/>





At first, Juliet
doesn't side with Romeo. She asks "why then poor villain didst thou kill my cousin."
After thinking things through on her own, she begins to change her opinion as she says
"what tongue shall smooth thy name when I thy three hours wife hath mangled it." Juliet
begins to side with Romeo because she is in love with him. She has just married Romeo
and thinks he is an angel. She begins to realize that there must be some missing
information. Surely the man she loves would not have killed her cousin without
provocation. Perhaps, the catalyst for this change in Juliet is the Nurse. She begins to
express a poor opinion of Romeo now that he has killed Tybalt. Juliet was in agreement
with many of the Nurse's comments until she heard them spoken by someone else. It is
then she realizes that she cannot think such horrible things about the man she has
married. While Juliet never finds out specifically what happened, she trusts Romeo acted
justly. Of course, we know that Romeo was provoked, but Juliet takes it all on faith.












Sunday, December 28, 2014

Explain the impact slave revolts had on attitudes toward slavery both for and against?

The slave revolts in what would become Haiti created the
second independent republic in the Americas and created panic across the slaveholding
world of the Americas.  It undermined slavery in the Carribean and with slave revolts in
places like Jamaica undermined slavery in the British
Empire.


Slave revolts in the U.S. such as the rebellion of
Nat Turner, tended to harden positions among whites in defense of slavery, and lead to
suppression of abolitionist expression in the South, and in the North it dissuaded some
against abolition, as such revolts played into the hands of slave apologists about the
natural "savagery" of blacks, while those who were militant in the abollition movement
regarded such revolts as the natural instincts of humans yearning to be
free.


However while slaves seeking to runaway invoked
sympathy toward abolition, slave violence while understandable from the perspective of
today, tended to horrify whites and could be manipulated to bring disrepute to
abolitionist efforts in the white population. Essentially the argument was that the end
of slavery would bring about racial violence and race
war.


Militias were much more organized in the South than
the North, for fear of slave revolts. This is particularly the case in states that had a
large black minority or in the case of South Carolina, a black
majority.


Black abolitionists, particularly those who had
spent some time in slavery had a different perspective.

What are some of the details revealed by the author in "The Most Dangerous Game"?"Details" is a literary term, and I need an example.

I have provided a list of pertinent facts and information
provided by the author in "The Most Dangerous
Game."


  • The protagonist is Sanger Rainsford, a
    world-renowned big game hunter on his way to hunt jaguars along the Amazon
    River.

  • The antagonist is General Zaroff, a Russian
    Cossack who loves to hunt but has become bored with many aspects of
    it.

  • The setting is Ship-Trap Island, Zaroff's home
    located somewhere in the Caribbean Sea.

  • The two men meet
    when Rainsford accidentally falls off his yacht and swims
    ashore.

  • Zaroff's chateau is magnificently furnished, and
    he seems to enjoy all the luxuries of life, despite his isolation and the remote
    location of the island.

readability="14.904458598726">

The dining room
to which Ivan conducted him was in many ways remarkable. There was a medieval
magnificence about it; it suggested a baronial hall of feudal times with its oaken
panels, its high ceiling, its vast refectory tables where twoscore men could sit down to
eat. About the hall were mounted heads of many animals--lions, tigers, elephants, moose,
bears; larger or more perfect specimens Rainsford had never seen. At the great table the
general was sitting,
alone.



  • Also living
    on the island is Zaroff's servant, Ivan--a giant of a man and a former Cossack who
    served under the general.

  • Zaroff cuts an impressive
    figure:

readability="15.658252427184">

Rainsford's
first impression was that the man was singularly handsome; his second was that there was
an original, almost bizarre quality about the general's face. He was a tall man past
middle age, for his hair was a vivid white; but his thick eyebrows and pointed military
mustache were as black as the night from which Rainsford had come. His eyes, too, were
black and very bright. He had high cheekbones, a sharpcut nose, a spare, dark face--the
face of a man used to giving orders, the face of an
aristocrat.



Saturday, December 27, 2014

Elaborate on a quotation from Leo Tolstoy's "The Penitent Sinner."

"The Penitent Sinner" , by Leo Tolstoy, is a story that
deals with topics such as prejudice, self-deception, mercy, forgiveness, and redemption.
This particular story is meaningful because it analyzes these topics from the point of
view of three extremely important characters in theology, namely Peter, King David, and
John-whom Jesus loved the most.


The story keeps a pattern
in narrative, as the sinner begs to be let in, while receiving a negative reply from
inside the gates of heaven.


There are two important quotes
that denote the central theme of the story:


Didst
thou not in thine old age say this one sentence to the people: ‘Brethren, love one
another’? How then can'st thou now begin to hate me and drive me away? Either deny what
thou thyself hast said, or else let me into the Kingdom of
Heaven.”

This quote is essential because the
sinner reminds John that if he (John) claims to have been loved by Jesus the most, and
calls himself a saint, and yet has enjoyed the love of God- how in the world can he look
upon another man and say that a sinner cannot get entry into
heaven.


This shows an exposure to the hypocrisy of those
'holier than thou' types of persons who idealize religion as a world of pure sainthood,
but forget that they too have sinned. This is a direct blow to the organized religions
and to people who look down upon others. They should remember that, as their finger
point at someone, there are three fingers pointing back straight at
themselves.


Another nice quote comes from the saints
themselves when they say to the sinner each time he asks to get
in:


“Depart hence; such sinners cannot live
together with us in Heaven.”

Imagine how arrogant
it would seem to have Peter- who denied Jesus at his worst hour, David- who took another
man's wife, and John-whose life motto is "love one another"- tell a man who has sinned
just as badly as they have that he cannot go inside the gates of
heaven!


It is interesting how Tolstoy allows the main
character to retort back by stating facts that directly remind the saints that the way
in which they entered heaven themselves was by learning from their sins, acknowledging
them, and transforming themselves for the better.  How could they deny anyone entrance
into heaven? We are all the same.


That is basically the
biggest message that Tolstoy sends out in this story: Saints were once sinners
themselves. This show the natural weakness of men. However, it would be an even weaker
thing to not change, and not learn from them. Everyone gets the same fair chance at
heaven as long as they repent sincerely.

Please mark the stress in the following words: Conduct(verb) Conduct(noun) Produce(verb) Produce(noun)

In the four words you're asking about, the verb forms put
the stress on the second syllable, and the noun forms stress the first syllable. Let me
use boldface/rom type and caps/lc to show you what I mean. The stressed syllables are
capitalized and printed in boldface type:


verbs:
conDUCT and
proDUCE


nouns:
CONduct and
PROduce


Webster's dictionary
labels stressed syllables with a  '. So the phonetic spelling of the noun form is
ˈkän-(ˌ)dəkt. The phonetic spelling of the verb is kən-ˈdəkt. You can listen to the
pronunciation of each word at the web site link in the sources
section. 

Please explain some figures of speech in "Everyday Use"?I have to present about figures of speech in this story, but I do not understand clearly...

Figures of speech allow speakers to say things more
vividly and forcefully than if they were to simply say something directly.  Besides
having the freshness to their ideas that using figures of speech affords them,
speakers can really say more with figurative language than they can with the mere
literal.  That is, figures of speech afford speakers the means of adding extra
dimensions to their words.


In Alice Walker's "Everyday
Use," the mother who acts as narrator embellishes many of her words with such figures of
speech that reveal her astute observations on life.  Here are some examples to get you
started in your search:


  • In the introductory
    paragraph, she describes the yard with a simile (a comparison using like
    or as): 

  • Further, there
    is a description of her dream, which is a figurative way of expressing her hope that her
    daughter Dee will demonstrate love and appreciation someday for the sacrifices that she
    has made for her.

  • In the tenth paragraph, the mother
    describes the fire that has disfigured her daughter Maggie, employing sound imagery and
    metaphor [an unstated comparison]:

readability="7">

Sometimes I can still hear the
flames
and feel Maggie's arm sticking to me, her hair smoking and
her dress falling off her in little black papery
flakes.



  • In
    her description of Dee's youth when she read to Maggie and her, the mother states uses a
    couple more metaphors:

readability="13">

She of makewashed us in a river of
make-believe
, burned us with a lot of
knowledge we didn't necessarily need to know.  Pressed us to
her
with the serious way she read, to shove us
away
at just the moment, like dimwits, we
seemed about to understand. (the bold words are metaphoric, except the last
simile)



In this paragraph,
the mother vividly describes the attitude of young Dee as she reads, as well as
connoting how her act of reading was a show of superiority, not
love.


In addition to these examples of figurative language,
Walker's story contains the vibrant symbol of the quilts, which represent the connection
of family and history.  And, the theme is itself about symbolism as Maggie has been
"burned" by life, her life, as well as her dress falling in "papery flakes."  The
mother's "man-working hands" symbolize her having to play the roles of both father and
mother. 


Then, there is, of course, the irony of Dee's wish
to appreciate her heritage by taking her grandmother's quilts.  But, she looks to the
African heritage of her race rather than her true origin of family and the people who
raised her, an origin Maggie truly understands; thus, her mother gives the quilts to
her.


(Please see the link on style below for more
explanation of symbolism)

Friday, December 26, 2014

who becomes jim's mentor at the university?

While Jim is in college, Latin teacher, Gaston Cleric
becomes Jim's mentor.  The two spend a great deal of time conversing and eventually, Jim
follows Gaston to Harvard to complete his education.  Gaston is a passionate teacher who
is able to breathe life into the classics for his students and for Jim.  At the end of
the novel, the reader learns that Gaston dies of pneumonia.

What is the derivative y' of x + y + ln(xy) = 0

Differentiate x + y + ln(xy) =
0


`dx + dy + 1/(xy) d(xy) = 0` Using the chain
rule


d(xy) = xdy+ydx using the product
rule


`dx+dy+1/(xy)(xdy+ydx)=0`


Distributing
`1/(xy)` we get


`dx + dy + dy/y + dx/x =
0`


Moving the dx terms to the right
side


`dy + 1/y dy = - (dx + 1/x
dx)`


Factoring dx and dy we
get


`dy(1+1/y) =
-(1+1/x)dx`


`dy/dx = -(1+1/x)/(1+1/y) =
-((x+1)/x)/((y+1)/y)=-(y(x+1))/(x(y+1)) `

Thursday, December 25, 2014

What is the function of the title of Lee Smith’s novel The Devil’s Dream ?

The title of Lee Smith’s novel The Devil’s
Dream
functions in various ways, including the
following:


  • It alludes to a famous country music
    song in a novel in which country music is strongly
    emphasized.

  • It alludes to the opinions of Moses Bailey, a
    main character, who marries Kate Malone despite the fact that she comes from a
    music-playing family and Moses considers country music the sound of the devil. At one
    point for instance, Moses says to a son who is considering learning how to play the
    fiddle,

readability="8">

“The fiddle is a instrument of the Devil, and
iffen you ever take it up you will have to leave home. Fer you won’t be my boy no more,
you’ll be the Devil’s
boy.”



  • It alludes
    to the attitudes of many people besides Moses who, during the nineteenth century, also
    considered the fiddle to be “the devil’s box.”

  • It alludes
    to Kate’s continuing love of country music despite her marriage to
    Moses.

  • It alludes to a passage in the novel in which “The
    Devil’s Dream” is listed as one of the specific songs Kate
    knows.

  • It alludes to the tension between religion and
    non-religious behavior, a tension that is a major theme of much of the
    novel.

  • It is relevant to a novel in which show business,
    associated by some people with the devil, is a major
    focus.

  • It alludes to the emphasis on eroticism that
    becomes more explicit in later sections of the book.  Section four, for instance, opens
    with these words from a twentieth-century country
    song:

readability="15">

I've got a way with
women,


And an ace or two up my
sleeve,


I'm a five-card stud,
baby,


I'm all the man you'll ever
need.



  • It alludes
    to the opinion of one of the characters (Katie) that country music need not be
    considered Satanic but might actually serve religious
    purposes.

Explain the purpose of the following software utilities: - Drive Formatting


readability="3.5625">

Top Answer




class="profilepicContainer thumb"> src="http://d2hej51cni6o0x.cloudfront.net/images/user_icons/Anonymous_Male_Small.png"
class="profilePic" alt="francisndungu's profile pic"/>





In the modern world people mainly rely on computers
which are machines that analyze data and present information. Computers rely on
softwares which are set of instructions that guide their general
operations.

In order for the softwares to work well they rely on
other softwares called "Utility Softwares". Utility softwares are just but normal
softwares but their work is to make a computer effective and convenient in its
operation.

One of the Utility software is a firewall. Firewalls are
softwares that prevents unauthorized entry into a computer system or a group of
computers known as computer network from hackers. Hackers can gain unauthorized use to
your computers to steal, delete or edit information. In a more serious case they may
lender your computer useless by introducing viruses that may damage your computer.

Firewall therefore limit who and what kind of information is shown to
different kind of people or computer accessories.

On the other
hand a computer relies on hard disk to keep information in form of a series of
magnetized and demagnetized areas. Since a computer is a digital devices it encodes
information and stores it in only two forms either 0 or 1. In a hard disk the
information is stored in a series of magnetized and non magnetized area. Magnetized area
represent 1 and non-magnetized area represent 0. When information is being written in a
hard disk it starts from the inside to the outside. Sometimes you may delete information
from a hard disk therefore leaving a series of gaps in the disk. Illustration -Consider
a parking area where cars and long trailers are parked and the parking is full. If 10
car drivers remove their vehicles which were in different locations the parking will
have many gaps but only cars can fit in the gaps not a trailer!. A watchman or a Carpark
Manager is forced to call the owners of the vehicles to rearrange the vehicles again in
order to have the vacant parking lots in one area.This is how the Disk Defragmenter
works it Consolidates the data in one area and the empty space in the other area leaving
a blank space which is more usable.

Finally the Drive formatting
Utility is a set of instructions that makes the layout of how data is stored in a disk.
Example, as seen above, data is stored through a series of magnetized and non-magnetized
area on the disk. The area to be magnetized are laid down by "formating" the disk
therefore dividing it into sectors and tracks which are ready to be fed with data for
storage.







class="message-footer">



data-id="357189" data-method="/api/2.0/qa/rateAnswer">
like

id="upvoteCount-rateAnswer-357189">0


data-method="/api/2.0/qa/rateAnswer">
dislike
itemprop="downvoteCount"
id="downvoteCount-rateAnswer-357189">0







On taxes, is President Obama’s plan even more of a disappointment?Legislators and economists of all political persuasions agree America needs to...

It seems like the subtext of the question might have
already answered it.  Frankly, I am not sure that one can fully assess the President's
ideas on taxes until its long term effects are seen.  Differing economic philosophies
are always going to have staunch opponents and proponents. I am not sure that the
current economic situation is one whereby one can fully stick to one singular economic
philosophy and hope to find success.  The problem is so very complex and embedded in so
many different realms that a plurality of approaches have to be adopted and modified in
order to find some glimmer of success.  The President's plan seeks to take one such
approach.  I will say that the President might have identified a particular problem that
needs to be addressed in terms of how taxation impacts different economic brackets and
in seeking to bring light to this challenge, he has initiated a dialogue that is long
overdue.  Whether or not the President's plan is a "failure" is something that has to be
seen over time and cannot be assessed right now.

How might one summarize the "Dedication" from Lord Byron's Don Juan?

The “Dedication” to Lord Byron’s Don
Juan
might be summarized as
follows:


  • Byron opens the dedication by mocking
    Robert Southey, as well as William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, for having
    abandoned their earlier liberal political beliefs (1-16) and for having declined in
    skill as poets (17-64). He suggests that they have been motivated partly by desire to
    win official approval and financial reward.

  • He contrasts
    Southey, Wordsworth, and Coleridge with John Milton, the great revolutionary poet of the
    seventeenth century, who remained committed to his original radical political principles
    even when it was disadvantageous to do so (64-88).

  • He
    mocks Viscount Castlereagh, an important political figure of the time, whom Byron
    detested (89-128), depicting him as an enemy to freedom
    everywhere.

  • He returns to his mockery of Southey
    (129-36), accusing him of political hypocrisy and self-serving
    flattery.

The dedication thus establishes
Byron’s commitment to liberal, lofty political principles as well as to composition of a
kind of poetry that reflects a commitment to those principles and also commitment to
lofty artistic goals we well.  Byron considers Southey (and, to a lesser degree,
Wordsworth and Coleridge) old men who have lost touch with the political ideals and
poetic aspirations that once made them great.  He depicts Southey, in particular (whom
he disliked personally) as a sell-out and
time-server:


readability="16">

Meantime, Sir Laureate, I proceed to
dedicate


In honest, simple verse, this song to
you;


And if in flattering strains I do not
predicate,


’Tis that I still retain my “bluff and blue.”
(129-32)



“Bluff and blue”
were colors associated with the Whigs, the more liberal of the two political parties in
England (Tories being the conservatives).

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

How would you describe the feeling of reading a form of writing in solitude?I am curious to see how teachers feel about reading an article, essay,...

Emily Dickinson wrote of
reading:


readability="11">

There is no frigate like a
book


To take us lands
away,


Nor any coursers like a
page


Of prancing poetry.


This
traverse may the poorest take


Without oppress of
toil;


How frugal is the
chariot


That bears a human
soul!



Indeed, when one is in
solitude and reading a pleasurable literary work, there is a transport into the pages of
that book where one is immersed in the scene traversing time and place to that of the
work.  It is as though one dives between the lines of ink; there an imaginary life
begins and ends with the narrative.  And, when a novel is finished, the reader almost
feels as though she has parted with a friend.   


Whatever
happens around the reader thus transported in solitude is of no import; in fact, one is
startled if a phone rings or another reminder of the real world intrudes.  Certainly,
reading for pleasure is a great escape from the cares of the
quotidian.


If reading a speech in solitude, the reader can
clearly "hear" in the mind the speaker; she can pause and ponder the import, techniques,
etc., of the speaker's words without distraction.  Always in solitude there is room for
the mind to travel down avenues of thinking and return without getting
lost.


Reading in solitude is actually a paradox, for as
Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, "I am not solitary while I read..., though nobody is with
me."  But, the difference is that the reader chooses her select company
herself!

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Why did Shirley Jackson write "The Lottery"?

One could come up with a multitude of reasons as to why
Jackson wrote the short story "The Lottery."


Given that her
stories typically provided a foil to her life, Jackson seemed to be flirting with ideas
she could only dream about and invent. Shirley's life was one filled with content and
without conflict.


Therefore, in her flirting with the
alternative, Jackson created stories which illustrated life as something which held
constant neuroses, the alienated, and the exiled.


Her
story, "The Lottery", depicts the old ways of a small rural farming town. The town holds
a yearly lottery so as to "find" a person to sacrifice for the
crops.


Here, Jackson flirts with the idea of human
sacrifice for the betterment of society. There are two reasons as to why she may have
constructed the story.


First, the story could simply be
depicting a period in time where sacrifice was considered accepted. People simply
followed the traditions of their culture simply because it had worked in the
past.


Second, Jackson could be examining the fact that many
times people are willing to blindly follow anything for any reason. This shows the
characters to be mules-they simply do what society tells them to without
question.

Monday, December 22, 2014

How does the structure of a piece of work contribute to suspense?

Narrative structure can contribute to suspense in a lot of
different ways--from the line level to the overarching plot
level.


Shorter sentences tend to convey more tension,
resulting in higher suspense.  Using active voice (instead of passive) and powerful
verbs can propel the reader forward.  Examples:


-He was hit
by the man. (Passive voice and weak verb)


-The man punched
him.  (Active voice, more powerful verb)


Ending each
chapter on a cliffhanger can also help promote suspense.  Leave the reader with
intriguing, unanswered questions dangling at each chapter ending and they will be eager
to keep flipping the pages.


In the overall plot, suspense
is best created by withholding information and tension resolution.  For a romantic plot,
the writer maximizes suspense by keeping the two romantic leads apart until the climax.
 In a mystery, the true solution is kept from the reader until the very last moment.
 Ultimately, it's the unknown that keeps the reader in
suspense.


Finally, a good twist near the middle of the book
is a great narrative tool for suspense.  By subverting the readers' expectations with a
sudden twist, the writer can keep the audience engaged and
guessing.

What is something specific and literal in "The Scarlet Ibis" that is linked to the colors green, gold, white, red, and blue?Working on a packet due...

The color red is highly symbolic in James Hurst's short
story "The Scarlet Ibis." In addition to the "red, dead bird" of the title, the color is
mentioned in reference to blood; Doodle's "red" tiny body; a cardinal; and the bleeding
tree. Other references to the colors you
requested:


BLUE.  Doodle's
"eyes popped round like two blue
buttons." 


WHITE.  Doodle's
house is "gleaming white"; cotton is mentioned several times; and Doodle's brother
pictured the two together as "old men, white-haired, him with a long white
beard."


GREEN
Doodle's home has a "green-draped parlor," and nature's color is mentioned in the
woods, fern, pines, grass and the "green dimness where the palmetto fronds
whispered."


GOLD.  In one of
Doodle's stories, he tells of a boy named Peter who walks through sunflowers in his
"golden robe"; there is the "bright sunshine"; a "pot of gold"; and the "yellow cast of
autumn."

In The Prince, does Machiavelli favor the princes already in power or the would-be princes looking to gain power?

I think that this is an interesting point into which much
delving can reveal even more.  On one hand, the book is a dedication to Lorenzo de
Medici, a member of the ruling family in Florence.  The belief was the Machiavelli
wanted to dedicate the book to de Medici as a way to curry favor with him for a position
in the government.  In this, one can see that the book is written for those in the
position of power.  It is Machiavelli's hope that de Medici would be able to absorb some
of the lessons in it, and in the process, absorb Machiavelli in his own government and
take his counsel.


However, on another level, the book is
written for those who covet political power.  Individuals who have already secured power
would almost definitely find it it to be a role reversal if they were to suddenly adopt
what Machiavelli had been suggesting as opposed to what they were doing.  Part of what
makes the work so significant is that it truly presents a radical portrait of how to
rule and what it means to wield power.  This can only be fully appreciated by one who is
not in possession of political power, so they can understand how to recognize its
value.  It stands to reason that those in the position of political power had already
gained it and sustained through it with the traditional means of ruling, something that
Macchiavelli's ideas readily shun.  In this, the book becomes a more effective guide for
those who lie outside political power and wonder how to gain and keep it for their own
benefit.

Explain about this article about the US relationship with...

This is in no way surprising.  The US relationship with
Pakistan is very tense and will remain so for the foreseeable
future.


The US and Pakistan need each other, but they have
very little in common to serve as a basis for a solid relationship.  Pakistan is, of
course, a Muslim nation and many Muslims are very suspicious of US efforts in the "war
on terror."  A large number of Pakistanis are Pashtun at a time when the US war in
Afghanistan is seen as a conflict against the Pashtun people.  The US has a good
relationship with India, which is Pakistan's major
enemy.


Because of all these things, Pakistan will have a
very hard time trusting the US and the US relationship with Pakistan will remain
tense.

Sunday, December 21, 2014

Please give one example of superficial behaviours and the motivation for it in the story "A Doll's House" by Katherine Mansfield.

I would want to refer to the way that the other girls in
the school react to Isabel's anouncement that she had something special to tell them at
playtime. It is clear that the response to this and the sudden popularity that Isabel
gains as a result is superficial and not based on any serious bonds of affection or
friendship. This is of course something that Isabel herself manipulates to ensure her
popularity, as the metaphors used suggest:


readability="13">

Playtime came and Isabel was surrounded. The
girls of her class nearly fought to put their arms round her, to walk away with her, to
beam flatteringly, to be her special friend. She held quite a court under the huge pine
trees at the side of the playground. Nudging, giggling together, the little girls
pressed up close.



The implied
metaphor of "holding court" compares Isabel to some kind of medieval Queen surrounded by
her ladies-in-waiting. The possession of the doll's house has given her power that she
definitely exerts to gain herself popularity and importance among her social circle that
is completely superficial and not at all based on mutual respect or
liking.

Friday, December 19, 2014

How did the end of feudalism aid in the creation of the sovereign states?

One aspect of a sovereign state is that the government of
that state controls all the territory within the state and holds a monopoly on the
"legitimate use of force" within the state.  That is, only the government has the right
to use armed force within the country in most circumstances.  These conditions did not
exist under feudalism.  Feudalism, therefore, had to end before states could be truly
sovereign.


In a feudal society, all sorts of lords beneath
the level of the monarch have legal control over their small territories.  They rule
those areas and have the right to use force within them.  In theory, they are
subordinate to the monarch, but that is not always how it is in practice.  Often, some
lords get to be so powerful that monarchs cannot control them and do not effectively
rule the land where those lords hold sway.


The end of
feudalism puts an end to that system.  It makes it much easier for the central
government to rule every bit of land in the country because it takes power away from
these lords who can compete with monarchs for control.  In this way, the end of
feudalism helps to allow the creation of sovereign states.

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

What portrait of the family do we get from the story "A Snake on the Grass" by R. K. Narayan? Are the sons calculating?

R. K. Narayan’s short story “A Snake In the Grass” is less
about the snake mentioned in the little than about the family whose compound the snake
enters. Narayan describes various members in the family in a number of ways, including
the following:


  • The family consists of a mother
    and her four sons. They are apparently wealthy enough to live in a compound and to be
    able to afford “an old servant” named Dasa – the only character mentioned by
    name.

  • The family members swear at Dasa when he dismisses
    news of the snake. They also threaten to fire him if he doesn’t quickly catch the snake.
    Both behaviors suggest that the family members – including the sons – are not especially
    kind.

  • The fact that the family members have to discuss
    whether to buy a grass cutter suggests that they are not spectacularly
    rich.

  • The “second son” of the house declares that he
    knows how to buy things even during wartime, thereby suggesting either that he is highly
    practical or that he knows the tricks of the wartime economy. When a neighbor
    contradicts the son, a “heated debate” follows, suggesting that the son does not like to
    be contradicted.

  • The narrator notes that
    at

readability="7">

this point the college boy of the house butted in
with: “I read in an American paper that 30,000 people die of snake bite every
year.”



This news greatly
upsets his mother and makes her condemn Dasa even more strongly, suggesting (1) that the
boy likes to parade his knowledge (“knowledge” that may in fact be exaggerated); (2)
that he may enjoy upsetting his mother; and (3) that he may not care how his report will
affect Dasa’s situation. His elaboration upon his comments strongly supports
possibilities 2 and 3. Indeed, his further comments suggest that he may have a sense of
humor and is deliberately trying to provoke his mother. Certainly he seems to be
demonstrating both literal and figurative calculation in his further
comments.


  • On the positive side, at least the
    sons take a hand (literally) in cutting down the vegetation in which the snake may be
    hiding. They do not leave the job entirely to Dasa. They are not completely lazy and
    feckless.

  • Their casual dismissal of a visiting beggar
    makes them appear less than entirely attractive.

  • On the
    other hand, their admiration of the supposed skills of a snake charmer suggest that they
    are not completely cynical. (Perhaps they are even a bit
    naïve.)

  • The sons are calculating in the sense that they
    make plans to “protect themselves from reptiles in the future,” but this kind of
    calculation seems only sensible.

  • They are calculating as
    well in the sense that they keep “a safe distance” from the pot in which Dasa claims to
    have trapped the snake. Again, however, this kind of calculation is
    understandable.

  • The fact that Dasa becomes “the hero of
    the day” suggests that the family members are willing to give him credit when he seems
    to do a good job. They admire him and even decide to reward
    him.

  • Even when they suspect that Dasa has deceived them,
    they are not too upset.  All in all, then, the family and the sons seem more comical
    than cynically calculating in any evil
    way.

where does h(x)=|x^2+3x+2| fail to be differentiable?

Where does class="AM">`h(x)=|x^2+3x+2|` fail to be
differentiable?


By definition, |h(x)|=h(x) if
h(x)>0, 0 if h(x)=0, and -h(x) if
h(x)<0.


h(x) is a parabola, opening up (leading
coefficient is positive). It factors as h(x)=(x+2)(x+1), so h(x)=0 at -1 and -2.
Checking points in the intervals class="AM">`(-oo,-2),(-2,-1),(-1,oo)` we find that h(x)>0 on
`(-oo,-2)` and class="AM">`(-1,oo)` and h(x)<0 on
(-2,-1).


So |h(x)|=h(x) on class="AM">`(-oo,-2),(-1,oo)` and |h(x)|=-h(x) on
(-2,-1).


We need to find the critical points, which occur
when h'(x)=0, h'(x) fails to exist, or at the endpoints of the intervals. Since h(x) is
a polynomial, it is differentiable everywhere, so we need only check the endpoints of
the intervals.


As class="AM">`x->-2` from the left, the derivative is 2x+3, and
h'(-2)=-1.
As `x->-2` from the
right, the derivative is -2x-3 (*-h(x)=`-x^2-3x-2`*)
, and h'(-2)=1. Since the derivative from the left does not agree with the derivative
from the right, the function is not differentiable at
x=-2.


As `x->-1`
from the left, the derivative is -2x-3, and h'(-1)=-1.
As class="AM">`x->-1` from the right, the derivative is 2x+3, and
h'(-1)=1. Since the derivative from the right disagrees with the derivative from the
left, the function is not differentiable at
x=-1.


Therefore, the function is not
differentiable at x=-2,x=-1.


** A look at
the graph shows that there are cusps at x=-1,x=-2** src="/jax/includes/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/asciisvg/js/d.svg"
sscr="-7.5,7.5,-5,5,1,1,1,1,1,300,200,func,abs(x^2+3x+2),null,0,0,,,black,1,none,func,x^2+3x+2,null,0,0,-7,-2,black,1,none"/>

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

How is the statement,'A plague on both your houses' relate to Romeo and Juliet?

The main idea of the quote is to bring out the idea that
no one really wins in an intense rivalry. Rather than awarding one side "the winner" in
a competition of such intense magnitude, the third path of seeing both sides as losing
is the underlying idea of the quote.  The idea of a "plague upon both houses" reflects
how each side is as fundamentally bad as the other.  It is here where I think that the
ending to the drama supports the idea of a "plague upon both houses."  This is seen in
the Prince's speech at the end of Act V. Both houses end up bearing striking similarity
to one another of the narrative.  Each has lost a child to suicide.  Each struggles to
make meaning of the loss.  Each house cannot fathom why their beloved felt compelled to
take their life.  The "plague" on both houses is the fundamental struggle of
understanding how their hatred and enmity could lead to the death of a beloved child. 
It is here where the quote is felt the strongest.  The Prince brings this out in
suggesting both Capulet and Montague are to blame for their child's death. It is at this
moment where the quote's sentiment is felt the strongest.

What is a good thesis statement for an essay on mercy killing?

To write a good thesis statement, you must first know what
it is you want to argue in your essay.  You should then state your main argument clearly
and concisely.  There are a number of ways that a person could go in an essay on mercy
killing.  Here are a few possible thesis
statements:


  • Although it may seem preferable for
    a person to die, life is a precious gift and we should never take it away from a person
    just because they are suffering.

  • Although mercy killing
    can be morally acceptable at times, making it legal would put too much pressure on
    elderly people to accept euthanasia so as not to be a financial or emotional
    burden.

  • Because the basis of human dignity is choice and
    free will, people must have the right to choose when to end their own
    lives.

Monday, December 15, 2014

What were the major factors that allowed the British to win the Battle of El Alamein?

El Alamein is considered one of the more decisive battles
in the war for North Africa during World War II.  A major factor overall in that war
(and one we have seen again here in the recent civil war in Libya) is that logistics
(supply lines) are very long and difficult to maintain.


El
Alamein was a defensive line created by the British between the Qattara Depression and
the Mediterranean Sea, a last ditch line designed to prevent German Field Marshall Erwin
Rommel's advance on Cairo, Egypt and the Suez Canal.  By the time German forces
approached the line, Rommel was badly overextended.  After capturing Tobruk, his troops
needed rest and time to resupply, but Rommel drove them west, preferring not to give the
British time to regroup and organize.


Ultimately, the
German Afrika Korps was too exhausted to break the line, and Rommel ordered a halt to
re-equip and resupply, hoping to finish Montgomery and the British at a later
time. 


What most people forget was that El Alamein was two
battles, the first in Summer 1942 that halted the German advance, and another in late
1942 where the British broke the German lines and began the long retreat back across
Libya and, ultimately, out of Africa altogether.  El Alamein was the turning
point.

Is a social movement a political movement?

First, please note that different texts may use the term
"political" differently and so our answers here may not be the same as what your book or
instructor would say.  I would suggest that you check your notes and/or your
book.


That said, social movements are definitely political
movements.  Politics may be defined as the process of transmitting the wants of the
people (including groups of people) to government.  We should also note that politics
involves trying to help influence the actions of governmental officials and the policies
that those officials enact.


Using this definition, a social
movement is clearly a political movement.  Social movements are transmitting the wants
of the kind of people who make them up.  They are trying to influence the government to
enact policies that will be beneficial to those people.


Of
course, social movements tend to be unorthodox and tend not to use established political
channels such as voting and lobbying.  Nonetheless, their goals make them political
movements.

What is "Sheridan girls" in Mansfield's "Her First Ball"?

The question isn't so much "what is Sheridan girls" as it
is "who are the Sheridan girls." They are first of all, the sisters with whom Leila is
going to the ball. They are secondly, the sisters of their brother Laurie (usually short
for Laurence). Thirdly, they all are Leila's cousins: "This is my little country cousin
Leila. Be nice to her."

The Sheridans and their cousin Leila are on
their way to a ball, the first ever for Leila. She had been raised in the country
without benefit of society since their "nearest neighbour was fifteen miles," but now we
are to infer that she and her mother have moved to the city as she begs her mother "to
ring up her cousins and say she couldn't go [to the ball] after all." The Sheridan
girls' names are Meg, Jose, and Laura.


readability="9">

But every single thing was so new and exciting
[to Leila] ... Meg's tuberoses, Jose's long loop of amber, Laura's little dark head,
pushing above her white fur like a flower through
snow.


Sunday, December 14, 2014

What is Pip's first impression of London?

Pip's first impressions of London are visual. After having
never really been in the city itself, he had no idea how dirty and ragged it could be.
This is just part of the era, but it is particularly an aspect of London that Dickens
wanted readers to notice.


Pip finds the street gloomy, and
the description of Jaggers' office is terrible. Many dark overtones are used, and the
disjointed joining of buildings made Pip wonder why the city was designed that way. The
coach Pip had ridden in to get there was described as
weather-stained and the rags therein were described as
moth-eaten.  Jaggers' office is described as having greasy walls as
people intimidated by him backed up. Being so close to the courthouse, the area around
Jaggers office was described as pretty dirty as are most inner-city places
today.


This description is important because it foreshadows
Pip's experience there.

What was the "evidence" against Sarah Good?

When pressed to name names, Sarah Good becomes an easy
target for the girls.  Like Tituba, she is of a lower social status than the rest of the
town.  As a ragged, homeless woman, she is often ignored or dismissed as being crazy. 
Since people in the town already questions Sarah Good's Christian character, the
assertion that she works for the devil is easily accepted and not put into question. 
Once the lower rungs of society are out of the way, the girls turn their claims towards
more respected women like Elizabeth Proctor.

Saturday, December 13, 2014

How does "The Monkey's Paw" create an atmosphere of horror?

The atmosphere of the story is entirely horror; there is a
brief scene of familial comfort and home life at the beginning, and then events move
forward steadily, without pausing, and descriptions become negatively representational
instead of neutral or positive. Mr. White:


readability="7">

...gaz[es] at the dying fire, and see[s] faces in
it. The last face was so horrible and so
simian...



These descriptions
at first are subtle; while the narrative seeks to show things as normal, the language
becomes more and more negative, with short sentences and sharp exclamations from the
characters.


readability="9">

"I'm sorry--" began the
visitor.


"Is he hurt?" demanded the
mother.


The visitor bowed in
assent.



These language
choices, as well as the shortness of the narration, give the story a sense of
claustrophobia, that there is little room for the characters or even the reader to relax
and breathe. Simple descriptive language allows the final part to be the most
terrifying:


readability="11">

There was another knock, and another. The old
woman with a sudden wrench broke free... He heard the chain rattle back and the bottom
bolt drawn slowly and stiffly from the socket. Then the old woman's voice, strained and
panting.
(Jacobs, "The Monkey's Paw,"
gaslight.mtroyal.ca)



Each
part adds to the sense of unease: the first part is warm, with fire imagery, the second
part is neutral, with both fire and death, and the third part is cold and harsh, with
guttering candles and dark passageways. These elements give the story a morbid
atmosphere, and the sense that normalcy in the universe has been
damaged.

Thursday, December 11, 2014

In Ayn Rand's book entitled Anthem, what page is the word "blacker" on?This word is going in my essay about the dark to light theme.

The novel certainly goes from dark to light physically,
mentally, and emotionally! With the image of the rooms where the people sleep being
completely white contrasted with the candles used at night and Equality's cave, it would
seem like this book would be perfect if shot as a black and white movie. Then, just like
the Wizard of Oz, the movie version could change into technicolor when he escapes to the
forest. That being said, the word "blacker" is appropriately placed within the first
paragraph of chapter one. In Signet's student edition, the story begins on page 18 and
Equality is already in the cave writing his first entry which
says:



"It is a
sin to write this. It is a sin to think words no others think and to put them down upon
paper no others are to see. It is base and evil. It is as if we were speaking alone to
no ears but our own. And we know well that there is no transgression blacker than to do
or think alone."



So, yes, the
first image is the word "blacker" coupled with "transgression" or "sin" which starts the
book off in a very dark mood.

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

How can we get rid of monarchy in Britain?

In modern Britain, the monarchy remains in place because
of laws passed by Parliament.  That means that "getting rid of" the monarchy today could
simply be done by changing the laws.  There is a movement within the UK to do this,
though it has not gotten much traction with the
public.


Since the British monarchy is subject to law, it
could be abolished by act of Parliament.  People who want that to happen should engage
in the kinds of actions that are usually taken to try to change laws.  As you can see
from this
link
, groups that want to abolish the monarchy do things like trying to change
public opinion on the issue and persuade members of Parliament to act to end the
monarchy.


If you want to end the monarchy, then, your best
course of action is to engage in politics.  You will need to promote your idea among the
public and then use public opinion to pressure Parliament for
change.

Determine the exact value of b such that csc (6b + pi/8) = sec (2b - pi/8)

We have to determine the value of b so that cosec (6b +
pi/8) = sec (2b - pi/8)


cosec (6b + pi/8) = sec (2b -
pi/8)


=> 1/sin(6b + pi/8) = 1/cos(2b -
pi/8)


=> cos(2b - pi/8) = sin(6b +
pi/8)


cos x = sin (pi/2 -
x)


=> sin(pi/2 - 2b + pi/8) = sin(6b +
pi/8)


=> pi/2 - 2b + pi/8 = 6b +
pi/8


=> pi/2  =
8b


=> b =
pi/16


The value of b =
pi/16

The play "The Hour of Truth" by Percival Wilde is an intense psychological study on the corrupting influence of money on people. Elaborate this...

Percival Wilde's novel The Hour of Truth
is indeed an intense psychological study of the corrupting influence of money
on people. The reason for this is that the plot explores greed from a myriad of
different points of view and, although all individuals are tempted by greed at one point
or another in life, this particular story shows how easily people forget their morals
and upbringings when money is close by.


This story is
positive in that the bad get punished, and the good get rewarded. However, the battle
between self and society are intensified in the character of Mr. Robert Baldwin, the
secretary of a powerful bank president, Mr. John Gresham.
 


Mr. Baldwin represents an everyday American man who works
for a living and whose salary may not be as good as he wished to support his family. His
family, in turn, also represents the typical American family with its views on morality,
and a hope for the American Dream.


Everything changes when
we find out that Mr. Gresham, Robert's boss, is accused of appropriating the bank's
money, which in turn, hurts the clients of the bank. As Mr. Gresham is arrested we
immediately lose confidence in his character. Mr. Gresham was a good boss to Mr.
Baldwin, and seems to have been the type of person nobody would suspect. To see him as a
thief leaves a bad taste in the reader's rapport with him, making the reader realize how
badly money can influence people.


As a result of the
arrest, Gresham begs Mr. Baldwin to simply say three words during his examination on
trial regarding Mr. Gresham's transactions "I don't remember". As a reward, he offered
him one hundred thousand dollars: An amazing amount of money at the time of the
story.


Once again, money changed everything, only not with
Mr. Baldwin. It is his family who suddenly changes from being virtuous, respectable, and
incapable to allow Robert to tell a lie. When they hear about the bribe (which Gresham
calls a payment), they insist that maybe Robert should consider saying "just those three
words". This is another instance where we may find it shocking how money can overturn
family values.


Yet, it is Robert what brings the hope back
into the story. He simply cannot accept a bribe but, most importantly, he cannot bear
telling a lie. For this reason, he respectfully rejects the offer. This action left Mr.
Gresham ashamed of himself, which led him to confess his own
crime.


The end of the story is positive because Robert
Baldwin's honesty and integrity landed him a job in another bank. His reputation as a
decent and dignified man was spread out by Mr. Gresham, who realizes what a good man
Robert is.


However, with the exception of Baldwin, we do
not find any other positive dynamics in the story. Money only brings with it isolation,
punishment, deception, frustration, and the possibility of endless
shame.

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

How are Zapo and Zepo the representation of the same individual although they are two different people?

Zapo and Zepo are described quite similarly in Fernando
Arrabal's play "Picnic in the Battlefield". For once, their uniforms are nearly
identical except Zapo's uniform is a different color from Zepo, who fights in the enemy
lines. Therefore, here we have an ironic way of telling us "birds of a feather": Same
thing, different color.


Secondly, Zapo and Zepo's names are
also nearly identical with the exception of a simple letter which, again, shows that it
is the same thing with a different name: Two typical soldiers, sent to the battlefield,
no clue as to what they are doing in war, none of them is sure why they are each other's
enemies, they are about the same age, and have the same hopes and wishes. They both
represent the ignorant youth sent to fight a bloody battle that they cannot even
identify with.


We also find that Zapo and Zepo do similar
activities, share similar likes, and Zapo's parents are quite taken by him, treating him
like if he were their son as well by inviting him to the picnic. Again, both Zapo and
Zepo represent the huge loss of young men that occurs as a result of war: Young men who
often do not comprehend how dangerous war is, and who idealize it to an extent. Some of
them hardly know what they are doing in the battlefield in the first place. All are just
as innocent, just as unfairly taken, and just as naive. They are one same youth, with
many different uniforms, names, and families.

how does edwards sermon reflect puritan religious belief?

For a correct statement of fact, Jonathan Edwards is
hardly Puritan, in fact it is perhaps the perfect antithesis of Puritan belief.
Puritans, as strict Calvinists, believed that God determined before the beginning of the
world who would be saved. Those who had received some indication that they were the
recipient of God's undeserved merit were known as the "elect," but it was determined
long ago. There was no free will involved.


Edwards was a
product of the first Great Awakening which rejected Puritan ideas. He once commented
that the people of New England needed


readability="6">

not so much to have their heads stored as their
hearts touched. It is a reasonable thing to right persons away from
hell.



His sermons reject the
idea of predestination; rather he preached that all persons could be recipients of God's
salvation, and that justification came from faith in Christ. All persons in Edwards'
view could be saved; but all persons also could burn in hell if they did not repent. His
most famous sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
illustrates this point:


readability="22">

O sinner! Consider the fearful danger you are
in: it is a great furnace of wrath, a wide and bottomless pit, full of the fire of
wrath, that you are held over in the hand of that God, whose wrath is provoked and
incensed as much against you, as against many of the damned in hell. You hang by a
slender thread, with the flames of divine wrath flashing about it, and ready every
moment to singe it, and burn it asunder; and you have no interest in any Mediator, and
nothing to lay hold of to save yourself, nothing to keep off the flames of wrath,
nothing of your own, nothing that you ever have done, nothing that you can do, to induce
God to spare you one
moment.



It is interesting to
note that Edwards did not appeal to the emotions of his hearers as did his contemporary
George Whitefield; his sermons were read calmly and dispassionately; yet when he was
finished, several minutes were required to calm the congregation who often shrieked and
howled in terror of hell. One would never see such in a Puritan
service.

What percentage of parts will not meet the weight specs?Specifications for a part of a DVD player state that the part should weigh between 24 and...

Specifications for a part of a DVD player state
that the part should weigh between 24 and 25 ounces. The process that produces the parts
yield a mean of 24.5 ounces and a standard deviation of .2 ounce. The distribution of
output is normal.


What percentage of
parts will not meet the weight
specifications?


First we convert the boundary
weights to z scores using `z=(x-barx)/s`


Thus for 24 oz we
get z=-2.5 and for 25oz we get z=2.5.


The percentage of
weights within the specifications is the area under the normal curve between z=-2.5 and
z=2.5. From a table we get the area below -2.5 to be .0062, and the area below 2.5 to be
.9938, so the area between them is .9938-.0062=.9876


The
percentage that do not lie within the specifications is
1-.9876=.0124


So, 1.24% of the parts lie outside the
specifications.

Monday, December 8, 2014

According to Guns, Germs, and Steel which societies that had agriculture as their principal source of calories developed into political...

When you say "political structure societies," I assume
that you are talking about what Diamond calls (in Chapter 14) chiefdoms or states. 
Diamond states that only societies that have agriculture can advance to either of these
two stages.  However, not all agricultural societies make it.  Diamond says that there
are two ways that small agricultural societies can become
bigger.


First, they can merge because they have to merge in
order to keep from being conquered.  This would be, for example, a case in which two
smaller societies merged so that they would be able to fight against a larger neighbor. 
Second, a small society can simply be conquered by a larger one and become part of that
larger society.


So, the societies that develop into
"political structure" societies are the ones that are threatened from the outside and
have to either join with other small societies or be conquered by the outside
threat.

How is tension and suspense created in act1 scene1 of Hamlet

Tension and suspense are created from the very beginning
of the play.  The first act and scene features a midnight watch in the bitter cold. 
They are joined by Horatio, a close friend of the title character Hamlet, and hope that
he can help them sort out a strange, ghostly occurrence.  It seems that the ghost of the
recently deceased King, Hamlet's father, has been appearing at night, dressed in his
army as if ready for a fight.  This has frightened the watchmen and does thes same to
Horatio, as noted by one of the guards, Bernardo:


readability="6">

How now, Horatio! you tremble and look pale:

Is not this something more than
fantasy?



Beyond the
appearance of the dead king, Horatio relates a bitter rivalry between their home,
Denmark, and neighboring Norway.  With a dead king, an attack may be imminent.  In
addition, Horatio compares this evening to the night of Julius Caesar's death when the
dead rose from their graves and likens it to foreboding
doom.



A little
ere the mightiest Julius fell,
The graves stood tenantless and the sheeted
dead
Did squeak and gibber in the Roman streets:
As stars with
trains of fire and dews of blood,
Disasters in the
sun;



All of these things
raise the level of suspense and tension in the reader.

Compare and Contrast the War of the Worlds broadcast of '38 and Welles's other Mercury Theatre on the Air broadcasts.in addition, how these...

The Mercury Theatre aired several broadcasts without any
sponsors, and without sponsors the theatre group was doomed. Fortunately, I think it was
sometime in late spring or early summer 1938 that the Campbell Soup Company picked them
up and they were able to continue performing.  The similarties between the Mercury
Theatre performances were that they were live shows on the radio.  In addition, the
performances were mainly drawn from classic literature. What made the 1938 Halloween
performance different from their other shows was how Orson Welles framed the
performance. The War of the Worlds began with a musical tune,
anyone listening or just tuning in would think music. About 15 seconds into the music a
news announcer broke in with a special report.  It sounded like a news report very
similar in delievery and tone to the news reports Americans had become accustomed to
with regard to the rise of Nazi Germany. People took the performance to be an account of
an actual event. Since the theatre group was not introduced in the beginning of the
segement  (which was done deliberately under Welles' direction) it caused a fair amount
of anxiety and fear among those who were listening. There were even authentic reports
that stated people were actually running through the streets attempting to escape the
martian invasion.

Sunday, December 7, 2014

What are some ideas from The Crucible that I could use for the prompt, Conflict is necessary for change to occur?

In my mind, the most direct example of this would be to
examine John Proctor's character.  Simply put, Proctor does not become a better human
being without the conflict.  It is the political and moral conflict that grips Proctor
that enables him to become a better person, enabling change to happen.  Proctor is seen
at the start of the drama as someone who is willing to allow the Status Quo to
continue.  It is only through the trial where he becomes convinced that change is
needed.  Here is the first moment where Proctor undergoes a political reclamation.  From
an outsider who never really felt that he had a stake in the system, the conflicts in
the trial reveal someone who recognizes the political imperatives present and the need
to initiate change.  When Proctor undergoes a personal change, it is indeed to find a
"shred of goodness."  This is a very powerful line and an important concept.  The
relationship between Elizabeth and Proctor is one that only undergoes its change through
conflict.  If the conflict of the witch trials and of Abigail had not entered their
lives, Proctor would not have been able to summon the courage to stand up for himself
and she would not have had the chance to see him with his "goodness."  It seemed that
Proctor had been in search of this throughout the drama, only to find it at the end. 
This indicates that conflict is needed for such change to
happen.

Saturday, December 6, 2014

What is the difference between Northerners and Southerners and why would they not marry each other as im Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily"?

For the most part, there is little to separate Northerners
and Southerners other than geographical boundaries, such as the Mason-Dixon Line. But
had you grown up in the Deep South during the time of William Faulkner's short story, "A
Rose for Emily," the differences would be a little clearer. The South's hatred of the
Northern states had been building since long before the Civil War. Most Northerners
disapproved of the slavery still in existence in Southern states, and Southerners did
not care for the large number of immigrants that flocked to Northern cities. As the
Civil War drew near, the North's political power became overwhelming; and when Abraham
Lincoln was elected president, the Southern states soon seceded, and Lincoln
sent troops into the new Confederacy to bring them under control--and back into the
Union.


The hatred and bloodshed intensified for four years,
resulting in a defeated and devastated South. Slavery was no more, the Southern economy
was wrecked, and many of the Southern men never returned home. Southerners were forced
into a Northern-created Reconstruction period, in which the states were forced to
conform to a new set of rules--both social and political. The South slowly rebuilt
itself, returning to a more prosperous lifestyle, but most Southerners never got over
their hatred of the "damned Yankees" who had destroyed their
lands.


Such feelings were still evident in Jefferson in "A
Rose for Emily." There were still surviving veterans of the war, telling their tales to
a new generation willing to listen. Yankees were still barely tolerated in places such
as Jefferson, though Homer Barron's ready smile and good humor won over many new
friends. Many people thought it disgraceful, however, that Miss Emily--a member of one
of the town's most illustrious families--would even consider lowering herself to
marrying such a man, Northern born and of a common background. In Jefferson, such a
match would still have been considered scandalous.

What is the Universal Truth/truths in the story " The open Window".If possible just give one main Universal Truth.

A universal truth is a truth which is found to be valid in
all places, circumstances, and by all people. Therefore, many times it is difficult to
define a truth as universal based upon the fact that not all people, in all places,
under every circumstance will find it to be true.


That
being said, most universal truths are generalized to be assumed to
be universal. When seeking a definition for "universal truth", it is almost impossible
to define. While many people have heard the phrase used, many more cannot define it
solidly.


In regards to the short story "The Open Window" by
Saki, one could easily generalize a universal truth for the text: Do not trust anyone
but yourself.


While this is a very pessimistic outlook,
unfortunately, it is true. Mr. Nuttel comes to Vera's aunt's house to find peace for his
nervous condition. Instead, he is shaken so horribly one could only expect a
heart-attack happening as he ran from the house.


Nuttel, if
sensible enough to not trust an innocent looking 15 year old, would have had no problem
at curing his nervous condition. Instead, because he trusted the young girl, he fell
even further into the inability to control his nervousness.

Friday, December 5, 2014

What is the impression Mr. Ewell makes when he is on the witness stand in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus rarely has a bad word to say about anybody, but he
has already told Scout that the Ewells had been "the disgrace of Maycomb for three
generations." The present leader of the family, Bob Ewell does nothing to dispel
Atticus' claim. Lewd, crude and socially unacceptable, Bob shows that he is out of place
in any social setting.


readability="8">

All the little man on the witness stand had that
made him any better than his nearest neighbors was, that if he scrubbed with lye soap in
very hot water, his skin was
white.



Bob referred to the
prosecutor as "cap'n," making Scout feel sorry for her father's adversary. Bob soon had
the courtroom in an uproar when he told the court that


"--I
seen that black nigger yonder ruttin' on my Mayella."


As
Scout explained,


readability="7">

With one phrase he had turned happy picnickers
into a sulky, tense, murmuring
crowd...



Bob showed that he
was uneducated and uncouth, showing contempt for Atticus, the judge and the serious
charges he and his daughter had made against Tom Robinson.

What ideas can I discuss if 'Violence is never justified as form of public protest' in relation to the London riots.

I think that one line of logic that can be used with this
particular prompt is the idea as to how lawlessness cannot be tolerated in a social
setting.  This would advocate that if individuals revert to breaking the law, no matter
their motivations, society ends up crumbling fairly quickly.  For example, regardless of
what motivated the rioters, the city burned, property damage was huge, lives were
ruined.  The rule of law is what allows society to function properly, and once this is
discarded, there is little guarantee of what can and will happen next.  At the same
time, I am not really sure the rioters' desires, whatever they might have been,
overwhelms the damage caused to so many.  The business owners whose economic viability
became ruined by the London Riots did not shoot Mark Duggan.  The children whose lives
where endangered because of the fires caused did not shoot Mark Duggan.  The people who
saw their lives disrupted by the rioters did not shoot Mark Duggan.  One reason why
violence can never be tolerated as a form of public protest is because the people who
are impacted are innocent.  They had nothing to do with the source of the rioters'
anger.  They were "there" and because of this, their lives are ruined.  For this reason
alone, violence cannot be accepted as a form of social protest.

What are some examples of symbolism in "The Interlopers"?

I would want to point out the way in which the violence of
nature against the two interlopers on her territory is symbolised very efficiently in
the way that both Georg and Ulrich are knocked down and crushed by the tree in the
storm. Consider how this event is described in the story, which comes just as Georg and
Ulrich face each other:


readability="10">

And before the moment of hesitation had given
way to action, a deed of Nature's own violence overwhelmed them both. A fierce shriek of
the storm had been answered by a splitting crash over their heads, and ere they could
leap aside, a mass of falling beech tree had thundered down on
them.



It is important to
realise that in this story, nature itself is a vital character, and such passages and
the symbolism they contain make us think that the true interlopers are the two men who
have foolishly started a feud over a stretch of land that they had no right to in the
first place. The tree, the storm and the wolves indicate symbolically the supremacy of
nature which is compared to the frail and arrogant claims of man over specific tracts of
land.

Film: &#39;Crocodile Dundee&#39; directed by Peter FaimanHow are stereotypical roles upheld and challenged?

One of the stereotypes that is both upheld and challenged is the role of the damsel in distress. Sue is supposed to be the delic...