In order to answer this, I would suggest you look at Table
14.1. There, you can see a number of attributes that differ in the various political
structures (bands, tribes, chiefdoms, and states). One of the attributes is food
production. Diamond argues that societies move from having no food production to some
food production and finally to intensive food production as they become more complex
politically.
Bands, Diamond says, have no agriculture.
They are hunter-gatherer societies. Tribes that are less complex have no agriculture
but tribes that are complex have it. Less complex chiefdoms have simple agriculture
while more complex chiefdoms have intensive agriculture. All states have intensive
agriculture.
The reason for this general correlation is
that societies need a great deal of excess food production in order to grow larger and
more complex. In order for a society to support a number of people who do get their own
food (who are government officials and priests and such), it must have farming. The
larger the number of officials and priests (and eventually merchants and artisans and
teachers and everyone else who's not a farmer) the more intensive the agriculture must
be.
So, the major factor is the intensity of agriculture.
The more complex the society, the more it needs to have agriculture and, in the most
complex societies, intensive agriculture.
No comments:
Post a Comment